Your theory is certainly intriguing, but it is important to note that it is purely speculative and not supported by any scientific evidence. The story of Adam and Eve in the Bible is considered by most scholars to be a religious narrative rather than a historical account. Similarly, the idea that Noah lived to be hundreds of years old is not supported by scientific evidence. As for the idea that proto-human society organized themselves in a way similar to a pack or group and that memories are passed down through generations as experience subroutines, these are also unproven hypotheses. While it is always interesting to consider alternative explanations for historical or religious stories, it is important to remember that these are ultimately just theories and not accepted as fact.
ChatGTP summary
knock knock
Hey there! Today I will say a conspirancial-like theory about what Adam and Eva means. I start believing that the old testament may refer to people as generations. The generation of Adam, for example, describes a group of people back in time. This comes in some compatibility with Noah being hundreds years old. Surpassing the sense of normal life span.
Why? well wild, however people may do not register death the same way do today. Most of these stories are told mouth to mouth or ok abstract story without indeed a rational context. However, I felt like to go agnostic and see if there is any other possible explanation. So here it is...
Adam could be a generic human population, males and females crudely separated in the way we do today. We are not sure what a point of view proto-sentients humans had. However, at some point, the biological differences created the first split! Eva. That could probably group proto-humans as Adam and Eva.
Now if you consider the Adam and Eva as generations of humans that could go really deep in time, I guess it makes sense to what it happens to them it's a description to what happens to humans at that point as groups. Accordingly, Noah could be a whole generation of people descendants from this protoculture. At some point people live normal lifetimes, I presume there the narrative changed into personal than society/groups. However this change is subtle I theorize of humans storytellers of the time, to specify for the later generations.
I suppose also since we are out in the crazy town, we can take into consideration the imaginary-friend theory too. Proto-humans were using hallucinations and they were fine with it. I assume that red vision came from the collective suggestion that there are different colors. Somehow a spiritual/social differation point (agreeing this is red) pushed the genetic mutation of the creation of three colored cones cells. Proof about it? None... however, it is a very interesting high functional random mutation to occur completely random. Yes, I am aware of Evolution, however, evolution is unsure how often mutations occur with such a high benefit in rather small population groups... In other sense! sure if the group is lucky... can get a lot of beneficial random mutations.
Now lucky... is in some sense the placebo effect. It is a giggling similarity between the notions. I have no proof... I will go through for a lucky guess... Well, it is wild! However, not yet irrational. The only hypothesis to be validated is how people were using hallucinations. We have recorded cases people sharing hallucinating triggers of similar effect. While the sense of a self is very abstract to proto sentient humans.
They were also part of a pact\group of humans of commonwealth and prosperity. Usually following a leader figure, however, how this was practiced by first humans it is a very interesting discussion. it is not hard for me to imagine them referring to their packt as Adam.
Now if you add halucinations could indeed mean memory imprints, but as experience complexes and less than audio-visual, it starts creating a working theory. Yes, not a proof of it! However, I try to compile all hypothesis next to each other to make a coherent story. If there are not gaps within the hypothesis and the hypothesis are science measurable, it is a valid theory :) until measured. So I go on!
I have explained in earlier videos, why memories is more like experience subroutine and less that an image or audio only. Imagine a simpler mind how easy it can be recorded to an other human. Meaning when people passed away, the humans behind it may have to deal with a stinking body. However, the memory imprint of a person may linger and pass from generation to generation. I think that is the second coming and resurrection of Jesus btw. A state where you recognize experience subroutines that are passing vaguely from generation to generation.
Hey there! Today I will say a conspirancial-like theory about what Adam and Eva means. I start believing that the old testament may refer to people as generations. The generation of Adam, for example, describes a group of people back in time. This comes in some compatibility with Noah being hundreds years old. Surpassing the sense of normal life span.
Why? well wild, however people may do not register death the same way do today. Most of these stories are told mouth to mouth or ok abstract story without indeed a rational context. However, I felt like to go agnostic and see if there is any other possible explanation. So here it is...
Adam could be a generic human population, males and females crudely separated in the way we do today. We are not sure what a point of view proto-sentients humans had. However, at some point, the biological differences created the first split! Eva. That could probably group proto-humans as Adam and Eva.
Now if you consider the Adam and Eva as generations of humans that could go really deep in time, I guess it makes sense to what it happens to them it's a description to what happens to humans at that point as groups. Accordingly, Noah could be a whole generation of people descendants from this protoculture. At some point people live normal lifetimes, I presume there the narrative changed into personal than society/groups. However this change is subtle I theorize of humans storytellers of the time, to specify for the later generations.
I suppose also since we are out in the crazy town, we can take into consideration the imaginary-friend theory too. Proto-humans were using hallucinations and they were fine with it. I assume that red vision came from the collective suggestion that there are different colors. Somehow a spiritual/social differation point (agreeing this is red) pushed the genetic mutation of the creation of three colored cones cells. Proof about it? None... however, it is a very interesting high functional random mutation to occur completely random. Yes, I am aware of Evolution, however, evolution is unsure how often mutations occur with such a high benefit in rather small population groups... In other sense! sure if the group is lucky... can get a lot of beneficial random mutations.
Now lucky... is in some sense the placebo effect. It is a giggling similarity between the notions. I have no proof... I will go through for a lucky guess... Well, it is wild! However, not yet irrational. The only hypothesis to be validated is how people were using hallucinations. We have recorded cases people sharing hallucinating triggers of similar effect. While the sense of a self is very abstract to proto sentient humans.
They were also part of a pact\group of humans of commonwealth and prosperity. Usually following a leader figure, however, how this was practiced by first humans it is a very interesting discussion. it is not hard for me to imagine them referring to their packt as Adam.
Now if you add halucinations could indeed mean memory imprints, but as experience complexes and less than audio-visual, it starts creating a working theory. Yes, not a proof of it! However, I try to compile all hypothesis next to each other to make a coherent story. If there are not gaps within the hypothesis and the hypothesis are science measurable, it is a valid theory :) until measured. So I go on!
I have explained in earlier videos, why memories is more like experience subroutine and less that an image or audio only. Imagine a simpler mind how easy it can be recorded to an other human. Meaning when people passed away, the humans behind it may have to deal with a stinking body. However, the memory imprint of a person may linger and pass from generation to generation. I think that is the second coming and resurrection of Jesus btw. A state where you recognize experience subroutines that are passing vaguely from generation to generation.
Comments
Post a Comment