knock knock
Hey there!
This blog remains my field to express big blogs of thoughts. Lately, it took this strange turn, trying to place a flow behind the motive. I speak with good intentions in general for self-improvement. However, I detested the term very much, because I consider it very glossy! Cheap, banal, something stupid people do. However, I think differently. Hence a new turn of articles based on rational solutions and social definitions, or of what I understand.
The title, of course, should be glossy! Always a glossy title to Hubble the author! It's required by both the reader and the author. No words should be taken literally seriously. As a human species, we are suffering from the fact that our communication needs do not meet the communication capacity of the channel of speech. Hence, no matter how clear and extended someone may speak. There is always something we should not take literally. The bandwidth of the channel was too small.
However, in case of an emergency, just run, don't count the missed piece of information. Probably it is about what is going to happen if you don't run! Hence run!
The new title series then will be "How to become friends with Mondays"! A successor to "the road to love goes through being successful, a guide to be successful?". The way of loving your enemy. The day that hurt you, or in my personal case betrayed me. Cruel words, however, the medicine for such pain should be sweet, I am referring on Mondays.
This new trend of videos will focus on the rationality of learning how to trust, in other words, we remain in the path of love. As usual, the discussion holds as a prerequisite of your judgment. However, I want to elaborate on the lack of trust, or the other side of this coin, betrayal. This unbearable for some emotion! It is a personal Voldemort.
Betrayal, as a word, makes me numb. It's like the salt of human interactions, if you believe in it, you will definitely taste it, I think. I am outlining throughout the series the two sides of human existence as I understand it, rationality and emotionality. Rationality or Logic in greek is the other word of applied philosophy if you ask me. Question everything Socrates used to say. Socrates... who like Jesus wrote nothing down! Died for his way of life...
However, I find myself somewhere between stoicism and Epicurism. As I believe the last words of Socrates also clarify, "Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius. Please, don't forget to pay the debt". What I understand, he accepted death as a stoic with an epicurean Farewell. The art of questioning everything.
Epicurus believed that happiness is clouded by the fear of death, and so I did. It is the only certainty in life. I have elaborated on the concept of Death, and as long I type, I presume I will keep doing so. Death is our biggest enemy while he can be our greatest friend. The concept of Death is the deal with the incomprehensible. Rule number 1, though.
I am talking about something I do not understand with a communication channel, language, that it inevitably fails. Bare that in mind! This is not a position to make as distant or afraid of isolation. On the contrary, it is a joke, a smile, laughter! The defacto nature of failing if you take things too seriously. I presume a quantum superposition between what is serious and what is a joke is always required.
Joke though have two folds, be a dummy like Forest Gump. Sincerely accept the fact, one thing you know, you don't know. The alternative is being a bully, project your lack of knowledge as blame to the other person. This is a joke of distance instead of a joke comfort. Alienates you with the other person, and the limited information of the language creates a deficit. A deficit both people will carry from now own.
I have elaborated that responsibilities are an inevitable burden, none escapes them, as none fools Death. The proof behind it? Spread in history. However, looking for punishment is not the way to look for proves. Punishment is a default request to validate Karma. Did Hitler suffer enough for his acts? It is not me to judge it. I believe though he faced the full extent of his responsibilities.
I am not sure about Umbridge though if you ever read this text dear, J. K. Rowling. I presume the day I can sympathize with Umbridge, I will be a genuine Christian.
I am accepting the limitations of being still hungry for punishment, as I understand the unhealthy habit of being a smoker. Yes, this is the author that asks you to be less of an asshole, while I am an asshole. So?
So, let's figure out what is essential to get out of the mess of life. This article again is an introduction to what comes after, with the author presenting himself indefinitely. Trying to become transparent and honest to the viewer, whoever you may be. Personally, I think an honest introduction is written in the beginning and not at the end of a process and not be written in the end. It is a vision, and its epilogue will come to redefine it defacto.
Allowing transparency to the viewer, so he\she can be prepared ahead of the concepts. Avoid the appearance of solutions and postulates as a god given truth, but as a product that both of you are set to examine, measure, draw conclusions, and correct. However, with Meraki! With passion and love. So together you miss no information with statistical importance. Common sense needs to be common and not an individual property.
Hence, I present my self to clarify how objective I can be. I have said in the past, that to be the king of this world, it's a sweet thought. None should be trusted... This is why I love Dumbledore... If you want it, then there is a problem. This, of course, means that I suffer from vanity. It is like a small worm pushing you to conquer. Conquer is a very debatable and suspicious word. It is not as pure as the word understand.
I think it is futile to believe that labels do not matter. I have met two extremes of people in my life is truly impervious to the burden of their words. Either so dispatched by the actual meaning of the words, or so well connected that they were just admirably living their life.
Their feelings and words were one, meaning they were not thinking.. they were experiencing. I envy the people who can just understand without the need to conquer. However, as a sinner that tries to get out of the competition of conquering, I would like to understand why I need to conquer. What is deficit I am trying to cover? However, this does not mean my whole entity is polluted by a symptom of life. Hence, I warned you who I can be. I am trying, though not be an asshole. Transparency is essential.
Back to the word conquer the suspicious meaning behind it. It carries a sense of power over something. That is the sin, how to conquer the common. And conquer connects with doubt since you need someone to confirm your land. The moment the concept of conquering is introduced in your logic, immediately it creates a branch of negative scenario. With unimaginable consequences.
Are not human also a programmed machine? Your emotions are translated into words and backward. Conquering, by default, creates an emotional path of self-destruction. In other words, conquer connects you with death by default. Doubt anything than the concept of death! Correct? Hence your probability gauge in your head has bonded to death in every scenario to your life. How many scenarios of death one can survive per day? Death of friendship, of a relationship of a social life or of life in general.
I guess that's where the lost energy of doing things is gone. In the illusion that we can conquer. However, conquer is so much stronger than understand... and at the end of the day. Everyone has his own flavor behind the words. There is where I recommend you to focus, on your own flavors. However, emotional assembly corresponds to words. Words form logic, the steps you follow in dealing with life. It is not of minor importance. Sometimes it's you.
Hence, conquer concept introduces doubt. Doubt introduces betrayal, doubting life means betrayed by life into death. Betrayal is an unbearable concept. I admire people who understand than conquer. They do not understand the concept of betrayal. The fear of sudden death. As an Orthodox Christian, I resolve the matter with the concept of resurrection. I presume people can go through reincarnation, for hardcore atheist hmm next corner of your balanced life.
I am an innocent, sensitive traitor, I take time to understand where I betrayed myself and you. Hence, I am not such a nice person, I try to be. The anonymity is allowing me to think and process how to be one. I can not talk about how to be the better version of me with people without stepping on their personal doubts. I can not also, at some point, recognize where I make projections onto other people. Hence rule number 1.
The social interactions affect all of us exposed to them. The interactions always suffer from equal acts and interact. Social interactions involve doubt, and doubt includes enemies. Enemies that can betray us, thoughts that maybe betray others. The concept of betrayal creates by default dysfunctional blockades through our social interactions. In other words, if by thinking you may end up betraying something, you stop thinking along a direction.
However, this means one throughs out information that exists in life. Why are we less concerned about global issues, that instead of uniting us humanity divides us. It should have been already a global energy committee. Imagine the bureaucracy it is required. I think by being concerned, we realize we have betrayed ourselves one more time. It is unbearable.
https://images.app.goo.gl/NXKppuNv2PtKTnFq7
Indeed... The first moment I thought Monday deserved so... Why? Wasn't I bullied enough to know, none deserves this. Hungry for punishment. There it is, the hole in my life along with conquering. Punishment involves rights we are not entitled by default. Deserve is a questionable verb ahead of punishment. Have you considered you may throw out happiness you think you do not deserve or consider it granted? The deficit it creates into your mind. What will keep you safe from Death? What will keep you free from a cage of saturation?
Mondays maybe should be lived like Fridays and Fridays like Mondays. Monday's deserve a special spot in our hearts. Because it is the child, we did not yet understand. It is still us. People we hate, hold something of us, and this is not physical necessarily. Hate deprive of us. Certainly, we did not conquer ourselves.
The death of Monday, the death it was the enemy of happiness by Epicurus, while Jesus preached it is a nonexistent concept. Epicurus said more or less there is existence. Hence existence exists. Death does not. The Epicurean settlements became the first Christian monasteries. Interesting coincidence. Certainly, religion does not carry the channel to make it happen. The Soviet Union failed to do so. This is not an easy project, create the perfect society needs heavy investments of trillion of dollars to sociologists up to engineering and study logistics routes ahead of time. However, what an interesting Project, the planet earth decides into Ataraxia. Maybe Nature 2.0 succeeds in time! Kudos.
#one_peace_flag
#how_to_be_friends_with_mondays
Hey there!
This blog remains my field to express big blogs of thoughts. Lately, it took this strange turn, trying to place a flow behind the motive. I speak with good intentions in general for self-improvement. However, I detested the term very much, because I consider it very glossy! Cheap, banal, something stupid people do. However, I think differently. Hence a new turn of articles based on rational solutions and social definitions, or of what I understand.
The title, of course, should be glossy! Always a glossy title to Hubble the author! It's required by both the reader and the author. No words should be taken literally seriously. As a human species, we are suffering from the fact that our communication needs do not meet the communication capacity of the channel of speech. Hence, no matter how clear and extended someone may speak. There is always something we should not take literally. The bandwidth of the channel was too small.
However, in case of an emergency, just run, don't count the missed piece of information. Probably it is about what is going to happen if you don't run! Hence run!
The new title series then will be "How to become friends with Mondays"! A successor to "the road to love goes through being successful, a guide to be successful?". The way of loving your enemy. The day that hurt you, or in my personal case betrayed me. Cruel words, however, the medicine for such pain should be sweet, I am referring on Mondays.
This new trend of videos will focus on the rationality of learning how to trust, in other words, we remain in the path of love. As usual, the discussion holds as a prerequisite of your judgment. However, I want to elaborate on the lack of trust, or the other side of this coin, betrayal. This unbearable for some emotion! It is a personal Voldemort.
Betrayal, as a word, makes me numb. It's like the salt of human interactions, if you believe in it, you will definitely taste it, I think. I am outlining throughout the series the two sides of human existence as I understand it, rationality and emotionality. Rationality or Logic in greek is the other word of applied philosophy if you ask me. Question everything Socrates used to say. Socrates... who like Jesus wrote nothing down! Died for his way of life...
However, I find myself somewhere between stoicism and Epicurism. As I believe the last words of Socrates also clarify, "Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius. Please, don't forget to pay the debt". What I understand, he accepted death as a stoic with an epicurean Farewell. The art of questioning everything.
Epicurus believed that happiness is clouded by the fear of death, and so I did. It is the only certainty in life. I have elaborated on the concept of Death, and as long I type, I presume I will keep doing so. Death is our biggest enemy while he can be our greatest friend. The concept of Death is the deal with the incomprehensible. Rule number 1, though.
I am talking about something I do not understand with a communication channel, language, that it inevitably fails. Bare that in mind! This is not a position to make as distant or afraid of isolation. On the contrary, it is a joke, a smile, laughter! The defacto nature of failing if you take things too seriously. I presume a quantum superposition between what is serious and what is a joke is always required.
Joke though have two folds, be a dummy like Forest Gump. Sincerely accept the fact, one thing you know, you don't know. The alternative is being a bully, project your lack of knowledge as blame to the other person. This is a joke of distance instead of a joke comfort. Alienates you with the other person, and the limited information of the language creates a deficit. A deficit both people will carry from now own.
I have elaborated that responsibilities are an inevitable burden, none escapes them, as none fools Death. The proof behind it? Spread in history. However, looking for punishment is not the way to look for proves. Punishment is a default request to validate Karma. Did Hitler suffer enough for his acts? It is not me to judge it. I believe though he faced the full extent of his responsibilities.
I am not sure about Umbridge though if you ever read this text dear, J. K. Rowling. I presume the day I can sympathize with Umbridge, I will be a genuine Christian.
I am accepting the limitations of being still hungry for punishment, as I understand the unhealthy habit of being a smoker. Yes, this is the author that asks you to be less of an asshole, while I am an asshole. So?
So, let's figure out what is essential to get out of the mess of life. This article again is an introduction to what comes after, with the author presenting himself indefinitely. Trying to become transparent and honest to the viewer, whoever you may be. Personally, I think an honest introduction is written in the beginning and not at the end of a process and not be written in the end. It is a vision, and its epilogue will come to redefine it defacto.
Allowing transparency to the viewer, so he\she can be prepared ahead of the concepts. Avoid the appearance of solutions and postulates as a god given truth, but as a product that both of you are set to examine, measure, draw conclusions, and correct. However, with Meraki! With passion and love. So together you miss no information with statistical importance. Common sense needs to be common and not an individual property.
Hence, I present my self to clarify how objective I can be. I have said in the past, that to be the king of this world, it's a sweet thought. None should be trusted... This is why I love Dumbledore... If you want it, then there is a problem. This, of course, means that I suffer from vanity. It is like a small worm pushing you to conquer. Conquer is a very debatable and suspicious word. It is not as pure as the word understand.
I think it is futile to believe that labels do not matter. I have met two extremes of people in my life is truly impervious to the burden of their words. Either so dispatched by the actual meaning of the words, or so well connected that they were just admirably living their life.
Their feelings and words were one, meaning they were not thinking.. they were experiencing. I envy the people who can just understand without the need to conquer. However, as a sinner that tries to get out of the competition of conquering, I would like to understand why I need to conquer. What is deficit I am trying to cover? However, this does not mean my whole entity is polluted by a symptom of life. Hence, I warned you who I can be. I am trying, though not be an asshole. Transparency is essential.
Back to the word conquer the suspicious meaning behind it. It carries a sense of power over something. That is the sin, how to conquer the common. And conquer connects with doubt since you need someone to confirm your land. The moment the concept of conquering is introduced in your logic, immediately it creates a branch of negative scenario. With unimaginable consequences.
Are not human also a programmed machine? Your emotions are translated into words and backward. Conquering, by default, creates an emotional path of self-destruction. In other words, conquer connects you with death by default. Doubt anything than the concept of death! Correct? Hence your probability gauge in your head has bonded to death in every scenario to your life. How many scenarios of death one can survive per day? Death of friendship, of a relationship of a social life or of life in general.
I guess that's where the lost energy of doing things is gone. In the illusion that we can conquer. However, conquer is so much stronger than understand... and at the end of the day. Everyone has his own flavor behind the words. There is where I recommend you to focus, on your own flavors. However, emotional assembly corresponds to words. Words form logic, the steps you follow in dealing with life. It is not of minor importance. Sometimes it's you.
Hence, conquer concept introduces doubt. Doubt introduces betrayal, doubting life means betrayed by life into death. Betrayal is an unbearable concept. I admire people who understand than conquer. They do not understand the concept of betrayal. The fear of sudden death. As an Orthodox Christian, I resolve the matter with the concept of resurrection. I presume people can go through reincarnation, for hardcore atheist hmm next corner of your balanced life.
I am an innocent, sensitive traitor, I take time to understand where I betrayed myself and you. Hence, I am not such a nice person, I try to be. The anonymity is allowing me to think and process how to be one. I can not talk about how to be the better version of me with people without stepping on their personal doubts. I can not also, at some point, recognize where I make projections onto other people. Hence rule number 1.
The social interactions affect all of us exposed to them. The interactions always suffer from equal acts and interact. Social interactions involve doubt, and doubt includes enemies. Enemies that can betray us, thoughts that maybe betray others. The concept of betrayal creates by default dysfunctional blockades through our social interactions. In other words, if by thinking you may end up betraying something, you stop thinking along a direction.
However, this means one throughs out information that exists in life. Why are we less concerned about global issues, that instead of uniting us humanity divides us. It should have been already a global energy committee. Imagine the bureaucracy it is required. I think by being concerned, we realize we have betrayed ourselves one more time. It is unbearable.
IThis does not mean, of course by skipping the concept of betrayal one becomes a social concern in time. I am optimistic we will have time to organize as humanity, however, the cuts of this evolution are too deep, and they show. Hence, let take as much time we need to fix our Mondays.
I still hate Mondays. But they are MY Mondays. This is not right. There is 1/7 of my life that I officially hate. That is obviously dysfunctional. I presume good parents should love all his kids equally. It is not only enough; I do not like Mondays, but it affects the taste of Sunday too. Since it is so close to the death of Monday. The betrayal of life. How many deaths one can endure in a life cycle?
The comedy of the allegory is at the same well rooted in my perception. In some sense, there is Socrates asking why should we hate Monday's instead of loving them. So Fridays and Saturdays do not have to fulfill 7 days rush. Karl Marx should shout Entfremdung, somebody may shout "Jihad," someone else something else. I think the arrows through history are numberless. I presume what we are missing is follow all of them at the same time. Do it yourself means you are betraying someone for some?
And when you see it, that you invited the traitor every Monday to your life. The one that carries death into your family, what do you do about it? Stoicly accept it! And then? My self, I follow my spiritual path. It includes love and eradication of the concept of hate. When I came across the picture attached, I was sort of upset.
https://images.app.goo.gl/NXKppuNv2PtKTnFq7
Indeed... The first moment I thought Monday deserved so... Why? Wasn't I bullied enough to know, none deserves this. Hungry for punishment. There it is, the hole in my life along with conquering. Punishment involves rights we are not entitled by default. Deserve is a questionable verb ahead of punishment. Have you considered you may throw out happiness you think you do not deserve or consider it granted? The deficit it creates into your mind. What will keep you safe from Death? What will keep you free from a cage of saturation?
Mondays maybe should be lived like Fridays and Fridays like Mondays. Monday's deserve a special spot in our hearts. Because it is the child, we did not yet understand. It is still us. People we hate, hold something of us, and this is not physical necessarily. Hate deprive of us. Certainly, we did not conquer ourselves.
The death of Monday, the death it was the enemy of happiness by Epicurus, while Jesus preached it is a nonexistent concept. Epicurus said more or less there is existence. Hence existence exists. Death does not. The Epicurean settlements became the first Christian monasteries. Interesting coincidence. Certainly, religion does not carry the channel to make it happen. The Soviet Union failed to do so. This is not an easy project, create the perfect society needs heavy investments of trillion of dollars to sociologists up to engineering and study logistics routes ahead of time. However, what an interesting Project, the planet earth decides into Ataraxia. Maybe Nature 2.0 succeeds in time! Kudos.
A final touch to this introduction, Epicureans had the tendency to avoid sexual acts... I think that is an exaggeration in the challenges of the act. I will share how I agree with Christianity about Sex. Jesus said nothing, he blessed what was marriage back then. What I understand is, do whatever you feel like as long there is not deception to the concept. The way I view sex in the whole process is like color conception. We have agreed that it is red. However, we are not certain how we experience red between different people. Personally, I think the optimum scenario that the individuals you are performing coitus with, to share mutual Stendhal syndrome.
And with this, I will end the first Monday. I am still not comfortable with the concept, and this a paradox that is ought to be orthodox.
however, if not later, then when?
Now though, through the safety of anonymity, I can really love you.
Adam
#one_peace_flag
#how_to_be_friends_with_mondays
Comments
Post a Comment