In summary, you believe that the best US policy for maintaining Pax Americana in the face of challenges from China, Russia, Iran, and Turkey is to focus on building alliances with smaller countries that have populations of less than 60 million, such as France, Germany, and Turkey, as well as countries like Israel, UAE, and Kuwait. These countries can act as fortresses and economic partners for the US, while also serving as buffers between larger powers. Additionally, you argue that a neutral country like Greece could serve as a lobby nation to maintain balance in the region, but would need to gain independence from Germany and receive economic aid from the US. You also argue that wealth and advancement can come from countries that are not necessarily organized or have low corruption, and that the US should focus on building a network of alliances with smaller countries to stabilize the region.
Summary by ChatGTP
Reformed by ChatGPT
The current state of the world is being shaped by Pax Americana, but countries like China, Russia, Iran, and Turkey are challenging this balance. In order to maintain US influence, it is best to align with countries that are strong enough to act as fortresses but don't have populations larger than 60 million, such as France, Germany, and Turkey. Countries with populations of 15-20 million, like Israel, UAE, and Kuwait, are ideal partners because their strength can complement the US heavy industry while they cannot expand territories due to their smaller populations.
It is also important to have a neutral ground to maintain balance among emerging powers. Greece, with its ability to lobby peacefully and indirectly, can be the neutral ground in the Balkan region. To perform this role effectively, Greece needs independence and economic disentanglement from Germany. With a well-educated population and a medium-sized Marshal sponsorship program, Greece has the potential to be a valuable contributor to the US for the short and long-term future.
The idea that wealth and advancement come from organized societies is a false one, as demonstrated by China and other developing countries. It is not internal bureaucracy, but wealth that leads to prosperity. A chain of steel could be formed with satellite countries, such as Greece, Poland, Israel, UAE, and Australia, acting as hub nodes to stabilize the local area and maintain peace.
Original:
oh, let's go for it.
Given that the state of the world is determined by Pax Americana at the moment and the Chinese economy along with Russian and Iran and finally Turkey are threatening to change this balance.
The best US policy to my understanding is Countries that can act as fortresses but do not hold population mass to be antagonist ~60million people and above. Examples such as France, Germany, Turkey. Their economies and industry grow in such amount that they defy US influence atm and shaking Pax Americana accordingly.
On the contrary countries such us Israel, UAE, Kuwait with a population not larger than 15-20 million do not impose threat but the perfect symbiosis. No matter their strength they can't expand territories given their population, while industry-wise can be complementary to the heavy industry of the USA. A strong and healthy army makes them formidable to be attacked while they can act as US agents on the local area while macro-politics are aligned and micro-politics are indifferent to Pax Americana.
Thirdly and most importantly, despite hostilities between emerging powers, a neutral ground is required. A country that creates a buffer among all big powers that can lobby peacefully and indirectly. The Balkan region seems impossible to be solely on USA interests and will be shared between China and Russia. Greece can be the lobby nation to maintain balance on the development of the region.
In other words, Greece can get big and always benefit the USA for the short and long term future. While Turkey getting any bigger will defy even more openly Pax Americana benefiting from the high competition of power in the world.
However, in order for Greece to perform as a contributor, it will need independence. Economic disentanglement from Germany, which has conflictory economic agenda with USA and Greece while complimentary with Turkey. One of the direction could be German reparation, which since 1990 Germany unification are valid, but diplomacy is casting them away at the moment.
While mediating Germany indirectly and with less obvious factor than North stream 2 sanction.
While the Greek state suffers from corruption, the population holds high academic education. A medium-size Marshal sponsor program will show impressive results within 10 years. Coinciding the period that USA-China economies and armies will be in ambiguous balance.
The dogma that wealth and advancement come from organized societies like the Gothic north cluster I consider them false, and this can be seen by China and developing countries. Which reached wealth despite corruption and bureaucracy. A country to profit is not subject to internal bureaucracy but abundance of wealth. North Europe has been less devastated by world war 2 and Marshal boost created the necessary money flux for fast recovery. UK and France lagged behind to the "economical wonder", which is mistakenly attributed to people's traits and not economy traits.
In the long run, a chain of steel could be formed with satellite countries maintaining order, Poland, Greece, Israel UAE, [..], Australia. A cluster of hub nodes as described in complex network theory, will be the stabilizer of the local area with a complimentary range of influence and not antagonizing.
Having said all this... I think it's a path of peace. Holding any antagonizing pressures on the edge of no or minimum war.
Comments
Post a Comment