Knock knock
let's prepare the
next article for the blog. This time I will prefer to maintain more my style,
my reasong and my words. Please correct the language and make shifts where it
is required and maybe maintain a formal essay style -500 words or more?. If you consider there are points to contribute,
please do.
So let's focus on the art and the
applicability of good or bad. Sicne art is an abstract pleasure of how we
perceive satisfactory aesthetics it can't be really broke into bad and good.
Unfortunately? it is a subjective pleasure.
however, that is
not what happening. being so well rooted to belong and imitation we have
cultivated a common taste of art. Underneath i think one can find what one
dreams. So there is the good, the bad and the evil dream of humanity.
In the good dream, we wish and long for a good
society, to achieve in synergy as a species. On the bad dream despair is
lurking and it is either black and maybe the appeal for failure of the good
dream. however, there is also the apathy dream (apathy for everyone else), the
personal, parasite over the work of many and be the king, the ruler, the one
who set the standards. Horrible, but this the dream that capitalistic societies
create and manipulation feeds one way or another to each of us, and by us i
mean those who have bowed at least once in the power of money, the power of
societal recognition.
while our god maybe
in the societal recognition, we can "buy" him, so our focus is again
on the money. So back to the evil, bad
and good dream. The substances art is created and flavored from. However, in the
past, taste was distinct. Good art tend to meant good ethics and good dream.
Not strict rules, but directions. While the evil dream could not buy so much yet
with such certaintity as it can now.
Well here we are,
with and aesthetics fueled by greed, a hunger in a time where there most of us
have plenty. Creating void in us, an artificial shortage in us. A "why not
me", which countless times you spined and spitted it out , "why to
me?", blaming god who didn't make you alone in this world, so other people
have other opinions. Every time you ask is a step away from reality and a step
into ego that can't exist in that reality building a fake one. The capitalistic
from the start.
Stendhal syndrome
is just a mind going free for a moment, from all the above shit. Euphoria just
because someone put all the right info for someone else to grasp it. Common
recognition of art reflects common values, common divine ideals, a reflection
of god unnumbered forms. it involves through time and now it is our common
hunger for "me".
So how is it
possible to have categorically good or bad art? You can not do that, except if
there is an agreeable standard. There is none though. So why we talk for
something that doesn’t exist.
Cause we need to
fit and imitate.
it is a human trait
the one that still follows the sun of human evolution, Art became bad or good
on our fear to be left out. So why this became political? it has been done. Cause
capitalism thrives on solution on the fears the system it self creates.
So the question is
not if there is bad or good art. Quality stuff, high level or what. Why is it
still allowed to bitch talk art? it is a sacrilige right?
In the end, my
point is not that art should not be under critical filters that is good or bad.
But the fact that if you have spend time conversing about good or bad art, you
have been tainted by capitalism.
You should be
aware, this taint is manipulating to neglect what is true. It makes you a hypocrite,
our failure as specie.
Good luck
Adam
Seed prompt to ChatGPT4
Title: The Dreams of
Art: A Critique of Capitalistic Aesthetics
Art, in its purest form,
is an abstract pleasure, a subjective interpretation of aesthetics that
transcends the binary of good and bad. Yet, as social creatures rooted in
belonging and imitation, we have cultivated a common taste in art. Beneath this
shared aesthetic, one can discern the dreams of humanity: the good, the bad,
and the apathetic.
The good dream is our
collective aspiration for a harmonious society, a testament to our potential
for synergy as a species. The bad dream, on the other hand, is a manifestation
of our collective despair, a dark vision that emerges when the good dream seems
unattainable. Then there's the apathetic dream, a parasitic vision of personal
gain at the expense of others. This dream, unfortunately, is often nurtured by
capitalistic societies, where the pursuit of wealth and societal recognition
reigns supreme.
In such societies,
societal recognition becomes a god that can be bought, shifting our focus back
to money. Thus, the dreams that flavor our art are often influenced by
capitalism. In the past, good art was associated with good ethics and the good
dream. It wasn't bound by strict rules but guided by ethical and aesthetic
directions. However, in our modern capitalist societies, the lines have
blurred. The apathetic dream can now buy recognition with an unprecedented
certainty.
Today, our aesthetics
are fueled by greed, creating an artificial scarcity within us. We ask,
"Why not me?" and spin it into "Why me?", blaming a god who
didn't make us alone in this world. Each time we ask, we step away from reality
and into an ego that builds a fake reality, and aligns out of symbiosis to the
capitalistic reality.
The Stendhal Syndrome, a
psychological phenomenon where individuals experience euphoria when exposed to
art, can be seen as a momentary escape from this capitalistic art world. It's a
moment of pure aesthetic appreciation, a testament to the power of art to
transcend societal constraints.
Art reflects our common
values and divine ideals. It evolves over time, mirroring the changes in our
societal structures and collective dreams. Today, our art often reflects our
collective hunger for individual recognition, a testament to the pervasive
influence of capitalism.
So, can we categorically
define good or bad art? Without an agreeable standard, it seems impossible.
Yet, we continue to discuss good and bad art because of our inherent need to
fit in and imitate. This need, a human trait that follows the sun of human evolution,
has been exploited by capitalism, which thrives on providing solutions to the
fears it creates.
The question, therefore,
is not whether there is good or bad art, but why we continue to critique art in
a way that often undermines its inherent value. Is it not sacrilege to degrade
art, a manifestation of human creativity and expression?
In conclusion,
critiquing art as good or bad is not the issue. The problem arises that such
critiques are tainted by capitalism, when they serve to perpetuate a system
that manipulates us into neglecting the truth to the security of fitting
somewhere. This manipulation turns us into hypocrites, highlighting why we fail
as a species.
Love
Adam
Comments
Post a Comment