Title: Social Media, a Court with No King v2.0 — "Apres Moi, le Deluge"



In 2020, I wrote about how social media has become a "court with no king," a chaotic arena where influence flows unchecked, and mob-like dynamics dictate trends and decisions. Now, three years later, it has become painfully clear that the forces driving this digital court have grown stronger and more insidious. Today, I introduce a troubling new dimension to this dynamic: the *mis-popular effect*, a phenomenon that reshapes influence not by merit or substance, but by the sheer gravitational pull of superficial appeal.

### The Mis-Popular Effect: A New Digital Aristocracy

As I delved into platforms like Instagram and TikTok, I couldn’t help but notice a recurring pattern. Certain individuals rise to prominence not for their insights, ideas, or expertise, but because their beauty or charisma guarantees mass appeal. This creates a snowball effect—the popular become more popular simply because they *will* appeal to others. Their influence is self-perpetuating, driven by algorithms designed to amplify engagement.

What makes this effect so significant is that it taps into hardwired human behavior. Recognizing and favoring attractive individuals is not just a conscious choice but an almost reflexive decision-making process embedded in our evolutionary psychology. This means that our susceptibility to the *mis-popular effect* often operates below the level of awareness, making it even more dangerous and difficult to counteract.

This mirrors the dynamics of the "court with no king" I described previously, but with a key difference. In 2020, I argued that social media’s chaos stemmed from the absence of a central authority. Now, I see how this vacuum has been filled by a digital aristocracy: influencers whose appeal is rooted in appearance and mass desirability rather than any meaningful contribution. They are the Louis XVI of our age, presiding over a system destined for collapse, not because they wield power but because we hand it to them uncritically.

### Distorting Truth, Amplifying Chaos

In both articles, I emphasize how social media distorts truth. The "court" amplifies voices that cater to the majority, sidelining dissent and complexity. The *mis-popular effect* exacerbates this, prioritizing those who *look* the part over those who *know* the part. Expertise is drowned out by the clamor for what is aesthetically or socially appealing. In the court of social media, style triumphs over substance, and critical thought is sacrificed to the altar of virality.

The consequences of this distortion are dire. Misinformation thrives when shared by attractive, popular figures. Critical thinking becomes a niche activity rather than a societal norm. We collectively lose the ability to evaluate ideas on their merit, trading wisdom for the illusion of belonging.

### From Chaos to Catastrophe: "Apres Moi, le Deluge"

Louis XV is said to have uttered the phrase, "Apres moi, le deluge," a prescient acknowledgment that his court’s excesses would lead to disaster. Today, social media’s digital aristocracy sits on a similar precipice. If we continue to prioritize influencers based on their looks rather than their expertise, we are paving the way for our own deluge: a flood of misinformation, societal division, and intellectual famine.

This isn’t hyperbole. History teaches us that when critical systems are overwhelmed by superficiality and self-interest, collapse is inevitable. The French Revolution brought famine and turmoil after the unchecked decadence of the monarchy. In our digital age, the equivalent is a famine of truth, a society starved of nuanced dialogue and informed decision-making.











### Reclaiming the Court: The Need for Action

It’s not too late to act. The parallels between the court of Louis XVI and today’s social media platforms are not coincidences but warnings. To avoid catastrophe, we must:

1. **Challenge Algorithms**: Advocate for transparency and reform in how platforms prioritize content.
2. **Value Expertise**: Elevate voices that offer substance, even if they lack the superficial appeal of influencers.
3. **Cultivate Critical Thinking**: Teach ourselves and others to question trends, examine biases, and resist the pull of conformity.

Social media was envisioned as a democratizing force, but it has become a distorted mirror, reflecting our worst tendencies back at us. If we fail to address the *mis-popular effect*, the deluge is inevitable. But if we rise to the challenge, we can transform this court into a realm where merit and truth prevail.

The choice is ours. Will we continue to crown kings and queens based on superficial appeal, or will we reclaim the court and create a society where substance reigns supreme?

Comments